THE DAYS OF NOAH and the "Sons of
God"
The Present Day UFO-ALIEN
ABDUCTION PHENOMENON
as interpreted from a Biblical Precedent
by J. Timothy Unruh
One of the most fascinating topics to be found in
our study of the Bible is that of its record regarding the early Earth, that
first great era in the history of our world, sometimes referred to as the
antediluvian age. It is an age shrouded in mystery and wonder, an age
pertaining not only to a lost world but an age separated from us in time by
a great dividing epoch of catastrophic world changing events. It is an
account of that world of human glory and depravity, and demonic
intervention; a world which was totally destroyed in the great judgment of
the Flood several thousand years ago, a flood which left our world vastly
and permanently different. Even though the evidence of this great event is
abundant in the traditions of many cultures around the world and confirmed
in many of the disciplines, the only direct information that we have of this
early period in the Earth's history is found in the first few chapters of
the book of Genesis and a few other relatively brief references scattered
throughout the rest of Scripture.
Because portions of this subject and related
matters touch upon issues of demonology it has been objected that "we should
focus our attention on Christ not on the Devil." Yet, among things, such an
objection would tend to perpetuate the somewhat obscure understanding of
this important passage of Scripture. Furthermore, if our victory as
believers is to be complete, it is incumbent upon us to study all of the
Scriptures, for as in any military engagement a knowledge of the enemy is
necessary. That we will be engaged with this enemy is of a certainty pointed
out most graphically by the Apostle Paul in Ephesians 6:10-18. Finally, our
Lord Himself exhorts us to study the details of that early age, the likes of
which will be repeated shortly before His second coming. Thus, if any ask
whether this question is worth laboring, we can but reply that all of
Scripture is given to us by the love and wisdom of God and it must be of
essential value and importance to accurately understand it if we are to know
the full counsel of His revelation.
Two days before the crucifixion of Christ, His
disciples asked Him, "What shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end
of the age?" (Matthew 24:3) His reply pointed to a number of "signs," all of
which together would occur in that generation which would see the signs, and
which would be the sign they had requested. These signs were climaxed with
the prophetic warning, "But as the days of Noe were, so shall the coming of
the Son of Man be, For as in the days that were before the Flood, they were
eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe
entered into the Ark, and knew not until the Flood came and took them all
away; so shall also the coming of the Son of Man be" (Matthew 24:37-39).
Thus did Jesus not only verify the historicity of antediluvian culture and
the great Flood, and remind us of the relationship between wickedness and
judgment, but He also encouraged us to study closely the characteristics of
the days before the Flood, because these would also characterize the days
just before His return.
The first great age of human history was brought to
its climax and culmination in the days of Noah. The sin-disease, which began
so innocuously when Eve was tempted to doubt the word of God, which then
began to show its true ugliness of character in the life of Cain, and which
came to maturity in the godless civilization developed by his descendants,
finally descended into such a terrible morass of wickedness and corruption
that even the most fertile imagination is defied in its attempt to grasp the
magnitude, and of which a full disclosure would, without doubt, utterly
shock the Christian's sensibilities to behold. The record notes that even
our very Creator Himself was dismayed and grieved to the core of His being
that He had ever made man upon the Earth. Only a global bath of exceedingly
turbid water unleashed from the windows of heaven and from the bowels of the
Earth could purge and cleanse the fevered and festered world. The word of
God clearly and unequivocally declares that the characteristics of those
awful and tragic days, strange as they may seem, are nevertheless to be
repeated in the last days of this present age. As a correlation between
Genesis 6:1-4 and Matthew 24:37-39, as well as correlations between other
pertinent passages, will show, it is clearly evident that in the times of
both cases corruption and violence exist side by side with luxury,
refinement and high culture. Such minglings apparently incongruous have not
been infrequent in postdiluvian times. It is thus urgently important, from
the standpoint of both understanding past history and seeking guidance for
the future, that we understand the events which took place in the days of
Noah.
As we can see from Scripture, and as pointed out by
our Lord Himself, the sixth chapter of Genesis contains an important message
for us regarding the days of Noah, a description of momentous interest and
importance to us: for our Lord has declared that a similar epoch of
worldliness will at length exhaust the forbearance of God toward the present
dwellers upon the Earth, and cause Him to come with fire, and with His
chariots like a whirlwind, to render His anger with fury, and His rebuke
with flames of fire; to plead with all flesh by fire and by His sword
(Isaiah 66:15-16). It becomes, therefore, an obvious duty to consider the
progress of wickedness and corruption among the antediluvians, so far as it
has pleased God to inform us of it; to acquaint ourselves not merely with
the sowing but also with the watering, the growth, and the ripening, of that
hideous crop against which the gleaming sickle of the Almighty at length
flashed forth from heaven; to note the various incentives to evil as they
successively appeared, and to observe the particular influence of each upon
the rapidly decomposing masses of society. For by so doing we shall arm
ourselves against the errors and temptations which are daily multiplying
around us, and be able to discern the threatening signs of our own times.
(Matthew 24:37-39; Romans 15:4; I Corinthians 10:11; II Timothy 3:16-17; I
John 5:13)
When men multiplied on the face of the Earth in
that primeval age, as in our own time, so also did the diffusion and
intensification of sin. For every form of evil which exists in thinly
populated locales will also be found, but in greater degree, where men have
multiplied; where there are countless vices peculiar to crowded districts.
Consequently, if they are numerous, men support each other in rebellion, and
are prone to become far more daring and defiant of God. Among ourselves the
strongholds of rationalism and atheism are always to be found in large
cities. As the families of the Earth increase in number, so also does
civilization, learning, and technology. Given the longevity of the
antediluvians, coupled with their immense accumulation of knowledge,
experience, and skill, their civilization must have advanced to an almost
inconceivable degree. One recorded specimen of antediluvian industry was the
Ark built singly through the labor, and under the superintendence, of a lone
godly Sethite, Noah, guided by God, along with his modest family. Sad and
instructive was the long past amalgamation of the Cainites (descendants of
Cain, the murderer son of Adam and Eve who slew his brother Abel) and
Sethites (descendants of Seth, the godly son whom Adam and Eve bore after
the death of Abel) in a society of leisure disposed to wickedness. Abject
indulgence, self gratification and depraved human glory seemed to be the
residual ungodly religion of the day. A wastefully indulgent life of vanity
and a disregard for the institution of the family in the careless giving
away of their children in frivolous marriages set the stage for the
appalling escalation of evil shortly to follow. No true worshippers of
Jehovah were to be found, save in the single family of Noah, a small remnant
connected with the line of the promised Seed.
Then, in the days of Noah, a new and startling
event burst upon the world, and fearfully accelerated the already rapid
progress of evil, leading to such a tidal wave of violence and wickedness
over the Earth that there was no longer any remedy but utter destruction.
For such, our text in Genesis reads as follows:
"And it came to pass, when men began to multiply
on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons
of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them
wives of all which they chose. And the Lord said, My spirit shall not
always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be
an hundred and twenty years. There were giants in the earth in those days;
and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of
men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were
of old, men of renown" (Genesis 6:1-4).
This passage contains a detail that is often either
ignored, disputed, or outright rejected - that of literal physical giants on
the Earth. Here we have the record of what evidently constitutes the first
great outbreak of demonic "genetic engineering" through the demonic
abduction of women, the result of which was humanoid gigantism. The second
outbreak occurred "also after that" sometime before Israel arrived in the
land of Canaan. For there they encountered the Nephalim or "fallen ones."
The pre-Flood outbreak had been, of course, brought to an abrupt end by the
world wide judgment of the Flood. During the time of David, who faced off
Goliath, God, through Israel, brought the post-Flood outbreak to an end. A
thousand years after the time of David demonic intervention occurred again,
this time in the form of human corporal possession which waxed rampant, at
the time of Christ. Finally, in our own time we again see evident trademarks
of demonic activity, by the fallen "sons of God," of a different legion,
most probably in the likes of the "UFO" and "alien abduction" phenomenon of
recent years.
As the record clearly indicates, the offspring of
the unions between the "sons of God" and the "daughters of men" were progeny
of the most grotesque sort, being "giants in the earth," the same being
"mighty men which were of old, men of renown," monsters not only in size but
also monsters in wickedness, and they always, without exception, were
disposed to thwart the purposes of God (Genesis 6: 1, 2, 4). In the minds of
many readers, the first reaction to this passage is such that, in spite of
its obvious and clear intent, its incredulity begs for an alternate
interpretation. The standard interpretation of the liberals is to think of
the fairy tales of antiquity, the legends of ogres and dragons, and the
myths of the gods consorting with men - and then to dismiss the entire story
as legend and superstition, but a careful examination of the passage will
elicit a far deeper meaning.
Often the biases and presuppositions we bring into
a matter prevent our understanding and acceptance of its face value and
patient meaning. Modern Christians have often attempted to make this passage
in Genesis more palatable intellectually by explaining the "sons of God" as
Sethites and the "daughters of men" as Cainites, with their union
representing the breaking down of the wall of separation between believers
and unbelievers. Another interpretation which avoids the supernaturalistic
implications is that the phrase "sons of God" referred to kings and nobles,
in which case the commingling so described is merely an account of royalty
marrying commoners. This passage is not the first to be met with a
naturalistic attitude as such. The miraculous parting of the deep waters at
the Red Sea, in which God provided a way of escape for the Israelites
fleeing Egypt during the Exodus has been liberally explained as an event
whereby "a shallow swampy flood plain was drained during an unusually low
tide accompanied by a particularly strong hot dry desert wind which dried
off the land, thus permitting the Israelites to walk on dry ground at the
shallow extremity of the Sea of Reeds." Yet the account in Exodus describes
something startlingly different; a miraculous and dramatic division of
waters where "the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea upon dry
ground: and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on
their left" (Exodus 14:21-22). In our present age the "scientifically
impossible" is most often rejected outright anyway. In another case,
unusually large and powerful animals, referred to as the behemoth and the
leviathan, are described in Job 40:15-24 and 41:1-34. In the past they have
been reckoned by Bible commentators to be descriptions of the hippopotamus
or whale, yet neither of these creatures even closely fits the careful
description of the beasts given in this passage of Scripture. It was only
fairly recently realized that the behemoth and leviathan were large land
animals, namely dinosaurs. Since the science of dinosaurs in our age is a
fairly recent paleontological development, dating back only to the middle of
the last century, most of the early writers of which our present
commentaries are derived had no knowledge of these creatures preserved in
the fossil graveyards of the Earth. Had they taken God's word at face value
and studied the descriptions of Job more carefully our knowledge and science
of dinosaurs might very well have come at a much earlier time. Even the
literal interpretation of the vast longevity of the antediluvians, who lived
to such great age of nearly a thousand years instead of being cut off at
three score and ten, as in our age, is most often brought into question if
not rejected outright by some theologians and Bible students. Regarding
Genesis 6:1-4, none of the naturalistic interpretations, however, explain
why the progeny of such unions would be "giants" or why they would lead to
universal corruption and violence. Although Scripture does teach that
believers should not wed unbelievers (II Corinthians 6:14; I Corinthians
7:39), there is no intimation that this particular sin is unforgivable or
necessarily more productive of general moral deterioration than other sins.
Regardless of intellectual difficulties, it is clear that something most
remarkable, beyond the normal and natural, is described in Genesis 6:1-4.
The first matter of understanding regarding this
amazing portion of Scripture, beyond its plain contextual intent, turns
quite obviously to the Hebrew meaning of the phrase "sons of God" (bene
elohim). In the New Testament, of course, the term son of God is used with
reference to all who have been born again through personal faith in Jesus
Christ (John 1:12; Romans 8:14; etc.), and the concept of a spiritual
relationship of believers to God as analogous to that of children to a
father is also found in the Old Testament (Psalm 73:15; Hosea 1:10;
Deuteronomy 32:5; Exodus 4:22; Isaiah 43:6). However, none of these examples
use the same phrase as Genesis 6:2, 4; furthermore, in each case the meaning
is not really parallel to the meaning given in Genesis. Neither the
descendants of Seth nor true believers of any sort have been previously
referred to in Genesis as sons of God in any kind of spiritual sense and,
except for Adam himself, they could not have been sons of God in a physical
sense. In context, such a meaning would be strained, to say the least, in
the absence of any kind of explanation. When we are told that "men" began to
multiply on the face of the Earth, and that the sons of God saw the
daughters of "men," in each case the human race is clearly signified, in
other words the descendants of Cain and Seth alike. Hence the "sons of God"
are plainly distinguished from the generations of Adam. The only obvious and
natural meaning without such clarification is that these beings were sons of
God, rather than of men, because they have been created, not born. Such a
description, of course, would apply only to Adam (Luke 3:38) and to the
angels, whom God had directly created (Psalm 148:2, 5: Psalm 104:4;
Colossians 1:16).
The actual expression "sons of God," bene
elohim, occurs explicitly three other times, all in the very ancient
book of Job (1:6; 2:1; 38:7), and in each case the term refers indisputably
to angelic beings. These are the beings whom, apparently, were created
sometime during the first half of the creation week, probably on the first
day (Genesis 2:1; Job 38:4-7; Luke 2:13). Twice in the beginning of the book
of Job we read of the sons of God presenting themselves before Him at stated
times, and Satan also comes with them as being himself a son of God, though
a disobedient, fallen, and rebellious one. In Job 38:7 the morning stars are
represented as singing together, and the sons of God as shouting for joy,
over the creation of our Earth. There are, as well, implicit references to
these sons of God in a number of other passages. There is no doubt that, in
these passages, the meaning also applies exclusively to the angels. A very
similar form bar elohim is used in Daniel 3:25, and refers either to an
angel or to a theophany. The term "sons of the mighty" (bene elim) is used
in Psalm 29:1 and also Psalm 89:6, and again refers to angels. The sons of
Elohim the mighty Creator are confined to those creatures made directly by
the Divine hand, and not born of other beings of their own order. Hence, in
Luke's genealogy of our Lord, Adam is called a son of God (Luke 3:38), and,
so also Christ is said to give to them that receive Him power to become the
sons of God (John 1:12). For these are born again of the Spirit of God as to
their inner man even in the present life. This is only possible with man
since he is delivered from the penalty of death and brought into newness of
life through a substitutionary atonement, unlike the angels which, on the
other hand, have been fixed in their position as angels of grace, or
damnation, the latter hopelessly lost in their state of perdition. At the
resurrection those of mankind who are redeemed by the blood of the Lamb, who
is Christ, will in their glorified physical bodies, be clothed with a
spiritual body, a building of God (II Corinthians 5:1); so that they will
then be in every respect equal to the angels, being altogether a new
creation (Luke 20:36).
Thus all reasonable doubt, insofar as the context,
language, and plain exegesis of Genesis 6:1-4 is concerned is removed
regarding the intent of the writer to convey the concept of angels, fallen
angels no less, acting in opposition to God's will. This also was the
meaning placed on the passage by the Greek translators of the Septuagint, by
Josephus, by the writer of the ancient apocryphal book of Enoch, and by all
the other ancient Jewish interpreters and the earliest Christian writers. It
is apparent that the first Christian writers to depart from this
understanding and suggest the Sethite interpretation were Chrysostom and
Augustine. Even an appeal to some of the later "fathers" of our present
millenium who abandoned the orthodox view of Genesis 6:1-4 because it is
"refuted by its own absurdity" must themselves then answer their own patient
frivolity of contending that the "giants" were merely individuals of the
same race who were "slightly larger and stronger, and more evil," than the
rest of the people. By the same token they must also answer why the world at
Noah's time was "divided" into Sethites and Cainites, which in reality we
know it was not. Furthermore, those who would interject the Christian Church
into the Old Testament economy to justify the "sons of God" as being simply
believers, thus mortal men, distracts the issue from one of a direct
Biblical exegesis to other grounds which are much the obscure, if not
outright fallacious. These men, in spite of their greatness in doctrine and
theory, were still humanly fallible and capable of missing important
elements of Biblical truth in their doctrines. In our own time this opposing
view has been widely propagated by C. I. Scofield in the notes of his famous
reference Bible. To apply the term "sons of God" as such to mere men is to
stretch the matter beyond a reasonable limit, for it can only refer to those
sons of God involved in a second and deeper apostasy of those fallen ones
from on high.
Only a portion of the angels who originally fell
with Lucifer committed this atrocity. These chose to leave their own world
and, having broken through God's limits into another, to go after "strange
flesh" (Jude 6, 7) and to exercise an unlawful influence over the human
race. These more devious rebels in particular are no longer found among the
spirits of darkness which now haunt the air. They no longer retain their
position as principalities and powers of the world, or even their liberty;
but may be identified with the imprisoned criminals of whom Peter tells us
that, after they had sinned, God dashed them down at once to His lowest
dungeons as an instant punishment of their impious outrage, and to deprive
them forever of the power of producing further confusion of this particular
sort. "God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to Hell,
and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment"
(II Peter 2:4). Jude 6 also mentions their present condition in similar
terms, and the context of either passage indicates with sufficient clarity
the nature of their sin. The demon-possessed men and their progeny, along
with all the other godless inhabitants of the antediluvian world perished in
the waters of the Flood. These waters are now the waters of the present day
vast oceans. It is apparent that those former inhabitants are referred to
in connection with the final judgment when "the sea
gave up the dead which were in it" (Revelation 20:13). Since all who thus
sinned were imprisoned in hell (II Peter 2:4; Jude 6) and, as it is evident,
are probably "the spirits in prison which once were disobedient when the
long suffering of God waited in the days of Noah" (I Peter 3:19, 20), and to
whom Christ went in the Spirit after His death to proclaim His ultimate
victory over their evil purposes. There are, although, yet other fallen
angels who were not bound, who still remain at large (Ephesians 6:12). That
angels have appeared to men in bodies of such a nature that they could not
only be seen but even touched as the selfsame Scripture declares, rumors
have persisted over the millennia that, as well, certain demons continue to
attempt and effect the ancient crime. That such has been so generally
affirmed it would be impudent to deny it. That Paul had such thought in his
mind when he bade the woman to worship with covered head "on account of the
angels" (I Corinthians 11:10) is, to say the least, within the limits of
possibility. We ourselves, being distanced in time from the ancients, or of
Paul, who were much closer in time to the origins of these traditions and
who still retained a fresh historical memory of these events, tend to find
them incredible in our own time.
Perhaps the most common of objections to the
obvious meaning of the "sons of God" as representing angels, apart from the
supernaturalistic overtones, is, for those who do not reject the idea of
angels, that it would be impossible for angels to have sexual relations with
human women and to father children by them, because they are "strictly
spiritual beings" who, unlike humans, "have no form." However, this
objection presupposes more about angelic abilities than we know. Whenever
angels have appeared visibly to men, as recorded on numerous occasions in
the Bible, they have appeared in the physical bodies of men. Those who met
with Abraham, for example, could not only be touched but they actually dined
with him (Genesis 18:8) and, later, appeared to the inhabitants of Sodom in
such perfectly manlike form that the Sodomites attempted to take these "men"
for homosexual purposes. The writer of Hebrews also makes a pointed comment
that, on various occasions, some "have entertained angels unawares" (Hebrews
13:2). The Lord Jesus indeed said that "in the resurrection they neither
marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven"
(Matthew 22:30). However, this is not equivalent to saying that angels are
"sexless," since people who share in the resurrection will surely retain
their own personal identity whether male or female. It should be remembered
that Christ Himself, even though in a glorified state after His
resurrection, was still recognizable to His disciples, and others, in His
masculine gender. Furthermore, angels are always described, when they
appear, as "men," and the pronoun "he" is always used in reference to them.
Thus angels have the power to assume human form in the fullest sense,
although the Holy angels never opted to exploit this power to their own
advantage, as did the demons. When Jesus said that the angels of God in
heaven do not marry, this does not necessarily mean that those who have been
cast out of heaven were incapable of doing so, or committing some form of
sexual act. It clearly was not of God's design or intention that angels mix
in such a way with human women, but these wicked angels were not concerned
with obedience to God's will. It was probably precisely for the purpose of
attempting to thwart God's will that this particular battalion of the "sons
of God" engaged in this illegal invasion of the bodies of the daughters of
men. The activities of these fallen angels was not only a patent counterfeit
of the unique conception by the Holy Spirit, Who through the virgin Mary
gave birth to the God-man Jesus, but an attempt in desperation to fatally
pollute the human race, and in particular those people through whom the
promised Seed was to come, and thus to destroy that Seed.
By a profound principle of genetic science,
discovered only recently, the blood line, or type, is determined through the
male, or father, and thus the blood of Christ was technically, and truly,
not tainted by the curse of Adam as it is in the rest of humanity, since
Jesus did not have an earthly father. The same sinless blood was poured out
at Calvary for all whom are redeemed in Christ. No other death could have
accomplished the substitutionary atonement and the propitiation of His
righteousness unto us. In the same principle, but in a design which was
diametrically opposed to the purpose of God and in almost inconceivable
malignity, Satan through his cohorts began to infest humanity with hybrid
offspring of an appalling characteristic, bearing cursed blood. This heinous
deed by the fallen league thus becomes all the more diabolical. Satan had
not forgotten God's prophesy that a promised Seed of the woman would one day
destroy him. He had planted his own spiritual seed in Cain and his
descendants, but God had preserved the line of the true seed through Seth.
When Noah was born and Lamech was led to prophesy that "comfort" concerning
the Curse would come through him (Genesis 5:29), Satan and his angels must
have reckoned that their opportunities for victory in this cosmic conflict
were in jeopardy. Desiring, if possible, to completely corrupt mankind
before the promised Seed could accomplish Satan's defeat, it is evident that
they opted to utilize the marvelous power of procreation, which God had
authorized and given only to the human family, and to exert their own power
to corrupt it to their own illicit advantage. In the days of Noah, men were
rapidly multiplying on the Earth, and by implanting their own "seed" in
humanity these malignant beings might be able to enlist in only one
generation a vast multitude as allies against God. It was an ingenious way
to effectively contaminate and make filthy the entire human race so that
God's seed, Messiah, could not come to offer eternal salvation. So these
"sons of God" saw the daughters of men and "took them wives (or, literally
'women') of all which they chose." With the demoniacal ungodliness of the
antediluvians in general, coupled with the irruption of the Serpent's seed
directly into large numbers of the human race, and then with the thrusting
forth of hordes of the monstrous offspring of these unlawful unions,
conditions in the world became finally intolerable even to a God of
compassion and long-suffering. Thus, such a scenario made the necessity of
the catastrophic judgment of the Flood all the more sensible and necessary.
Another objection to the bene elohim, or
sons of God, actually being angels is the contextual assumption that they
actually have male reproductive systems, which leads to the even graver
question of the nature of the progeny that would result from their sexual
intercourse with human women. Fallen angels have no possibility of
salvation, but fallen men and women do have at least this possibility. What,
then, would be the case with "people" who were half-angel, half-men? It is a
situation that is so grotesque that it would seem extremely doubtful that
God would have allowed it to happen at all, even if it were physiologically
a realistic possibility. Yet, as already indicated, it would do violence to
the actual text of the passage if we were to make it merely mean that the
sons of Seth began to marry the daughters of Cain. If this were the meaning,
why did not the writer simply say so, and thus avoid all the confusion?
Furthermore, why the Giants, and why the universal violence? The sons of
Seth were surely not all Godly men; so why should they be called sons of
God? It should be remembered that they all perished in the flood. Adam had
many sons in addition to Cain and Seth; were they spiritual "sons of God"
too? Not very likely, at this period of history. Furthermore, why stress
only the union of godly men with ungodly women? What about the "daughters of
God"? Were they being married to "sons of men"? The naturalistic
interpretation is so forced and awkward that it seems to do disservice to
the doctrine of Divine inspiration to suppose that this is what the writer
meant to say. He surely meant to convey to his readers the idea that, in
those days of Noah, such an awful irruption of abnormality and wickedness
burst forth on the Earth that it could only be explained by a demoniacally
supernatural cause.
The apparent dilemma of the theologically
paradoxical and grotesque nature of the progeny of such unions is resolved
when one realizes that these children, even though true human children of
truly human fathers and mothers, were all possessed and controlled by evil
spirits. That is, these fallen angelic "sons of God" accomplished their
purposes by something equivalent to demon possession, indwelling, or taking
on, the bodies of human men, and then also taking, or "possessing" the
bodies of the women as well. The men whose bodies they possessed were
evidently thereby made so attractive to the careless and rebellious women of
the age that they could take over and use any of the women they chose. The
seductive beauty of the women, probably enhanced by various artificial
cosmetics and allurements developed by that time, was itself sufficient to
induce men to constant obsession with sex, assuring a maximum rapidity of
multiplication of the population. Thus, the "sons of God" controlled not
only the men whose bodies they had acquired for their own exploitation, but
also the women they took to themselves in this way, and then all the
children they bore - veritable children of the damned. I Kings 22:19-23 and
Psalm 82:1-8 sheds some light on the fate of these progeny in that unlike
their demonic progenitors they die an earthly death. The "sons of God," et.
al., were warned that if they proceed with the evil which God condemns, and
withhold their powers on behalf of the needy and afflicted, they shall "die
like Adam (men), and fall like one of the princes." Now if the children of
Adam were the persons addressed, it would be superfluous to warn them as
such, for their death would be a matter of course; hence it is quite
evident, again, that these are "sons of Elohim," not of Adam.
The fearful phenomenon of demonic "taking" and
"habitation" of human bodies has often been repeated in history, though
apparently never again on the global scale which Satan attempted in the days
of Noah. Many such cases of demon possession are noted in the New Testament,
and missionaries still testify to its common occurrence in heathen lands
today. The association of extreme violence with demon possession is well
noted in Mark 5:13 and Acts 19:13-16. Even in modern "Christian lands" where
the influence of the Gospel has until now kept it to a minimum, this form of
Satanic activity is evidently rapidly increasing. Spiritism, witchcraft, and
other forms of occult belief and practice - even Satanism itself - are
captivating the minds and bodies of multitudes today, especially among young
people. A closely related phenomenon is the tremendous recent upsurge of
interest in the "host of heaven" - in terms of astrology, the so-called
"chariots of the gods" and "gods from outer space," the various unidentified
flying objects, and their strange occupants. Although scientists have
pointed out many fallacious assumptions and interpretation involved in these
there remains a stubborn residuum of scientifically inexplicable yet
apparently well-verified phenomena attached to these highly unusual types of
data, including the more recent "alien abduction" phenomenon. All of this
should be a reminder to us that there does indeed exist "principalities and
powers, rulers of the darkness of this world, spiritual wickedness in the
heavenly places" (Ephesians 6:12) and that Satan is the "prince of the power
of the air" (Ephesians 2:2). Evil angels as well as God's unfallen Holy
angels, apparently on certain occasions have the ability both to appear in
material forms of various sorts (even as "ministers of righteousness" - II
Corinthians 11:15) and also to inhabit and control the bodies of human
beings. Furthermore Jesus warned that, in the last days, "fearful sights and
great signs shall there be from heaven" (Luke 21:11). It may be that this
particular feature of the days of Noah is beginning to be repeated in the
modern proliferation of this great complex of unexplained and spiritually
intimidating occult phenomena, the purpose of which appears to be to gain
direct Satanic control over the minds and bodies of hosts of human beings
before Christ returns.
The children of the unlawful connections before the
Flood, as recorded by Moses in Genesis 6:4, who became the "mighty men which
were of old, men of renown" no doubt gave rise to the countless legends of
the loves of the Gods; and no doubt the subsequent repetition of the crime
after the Flood reinforced these traditions. These explain the numerous
passages in the Classics, as well as in the ancient literature of other
languages, in which human families are traced to a half divine origin.
Doubtless many of the mighty labors accomplished by the earlier descendants
of Noah, such as the pyramids of Gaza, may be considered to have sprung from
reminiscences of pristine grandeur, and fragments of lore, handed down by
forebears who had lived a portion of their existence in the previous age.
Thus reams of mythology have been generated which is taught in public
schools to this very day. Now mythology enshrines the remembrance by man of
the earliest actings and teachings of these fallen angels and their hybrid
offspring of super human vitality. Such had come from the heaven and became
gods and they were worshipped as such. They had imparted "life" to humans,
they had performed spectacular miracles, and revealed great truths, never
before imagined. They had returned to the stars according to Satan's
delusion but not before they left a promise to come again! Such are the
themes of so many stories and beliefs around the world that the masterful
counterfeit of Christian truth is startling. The Biblical account of the
doom of these grotesque creatures in hell as recorded in II Peter 2:4 and
Jude 6 is closely paralleled in the Greek classics where Tartarus was a dark
abode of woe, as far beneath Hades as Earth is below Heaven (Hom. I1. viii.
16), a description which fairly corresponds to Peter's "pits of darkness."
Very significant, too, is the fact that it was thought to be the prison
where Zeus hurled Cronos and the rebel Titans. The mythology of the past is
a startling disclosure, albeit twisted, of the uncontrolled behavior of both
spirit beings and rebellious man. The Almighty had to destroy the ancient
world because it had become completely unsalvagable.
One of the most amazing facts revealed by
paleontology (the study of fossilized remains of creatures which inhabited
the Earth in bygone ages) is that nearly all modern animals have larger
ancient counterparts. Among these have been found fossils of mammoths, large
bears, giant insects, sea creatures, and huge reptiles like the dinosaurs.
Along with these are occasionally found giant human footprints, suggesting
that indeed, "there were giants in the earth in those days." Not only in the
Bible, but in numerous other ancient books, are preserved traditions of
giants. With such a uniform testimony from ancient tradition, and with
paleontological evidence as well, it is a superficial sophistication which
ignores the possibility that these data may contain primitive reflections of
the real events and characters described historically in the Genesis record.
As to why children born of demon-controlled parents
should grow into giants, a reasonable supposition can be made. The modern
science of genetics has shown that there are two basic causes of variations
in physical characteristics among men, namely mutations and recombinations.
In the genetic system a tremendous number of factors for different
characteristics exist. Some are dominant in a particular population and some
are latent or recessive. These can be "recombined" in various ways to allow
for an almost unlimited variation in physical features. Mutations can
introduce new features formerly not present through a response to external
influences whose energies effect random changes in the genetic system. It is
now known that such features can be brought about by design in the case of
controlled manipulation of the genes by breeders understanding enough about
the genetic process to do so. Today geneticists appear to be on the verge of
breakthroughs in "genetic engineering" which would permit them to accomplish
such things on a practical basis, including cloning, and gigantism. Given
the intelligence and supernatural powers of angels (and demons) such a
possibility in Noah's time is not only credible but all the more likely.
With their power over the minds and bodies of antediluvian parents, through
these secrets, the evil league of the "sons of God" could by genetic
manipulation, cause their progeny to become a race of monsters.
Although our text in Genesis 6:1-4 also includes an
assertion of a secondary outbreak of demonic hybridization after the Deluge,
this episode was not of the magnitude and scale of the first but
nevertheless equally as diabolical. As we read that there were giants "also
after that," it is to be remembered that when we come to the days of the
Canaanites in the Biblical account we find encounters with giants in the
land when the Israelites arrived there. When they beheld these people in the
new land they felt, as it seemed to themselves, like mere grasshoppers in
comparison. This agrees with a passage in Numbers which mentions the sons of
Anak who are said to have been known as, among other things, the Nephilim,
or of the Nephilim (Numbers 13:32-33). Even though the English rendition of
the word is "giants" the Hebrew form meant "the fallen ones," hence the
fallen angels. The term later transferred to their offspring. The Greek
rendering signifies "earth born" and was used of the Titans, or sons of
Heaven and Earth - Coelis and Terra. Humanly speaking, the Nephilim in
Canaan were descended from Anak, and so were also known as the Anakim. The
Anakim as well as the Emims, Rephaims, and Zanzummims were all a race of
giants existing in Canaan at the time of Israel's arrival. Among them were
warriors of exceeding stature, including Ishbi-Benob (II Samuel 21:16), Og
(Numbers 21:33; Deuteronomy 3:11); and the famous ten-foot-plus Goliath, a
great champion of Gath who defied the Israelites and who was slain by David
(I Samuel 17:21-29). Goliath was probably descended from the old Rephaim of
whom a scattered remnant took refuge with the Philistines after their
dispersion by the Ammonites (Deuteronomy 2:20, 21; II Samuel 21:22).
Tradition has it that by David's time there were only five great warrior
"kings" left in the land, represented by the five stones in David's satchel
(I Samuel 17:40), one of which he used to slay Goliath, while the other four
stones were marked for the other remaining giants slated to be destroyed (I
Samuel 17:1-54; II Samuel 21:15-22). After the time of David the giants were
extinct and the Philistines were no longer such a formidable adversary to
Israel. From then on the nation of Israel was beset with different problems.
Interesting enough, that these beings were real and not an impossible
phenomenon is confirmed by the discovery by archeologists in Palestine of
human skeletons of similar stature and of roughly the same period. These
people were, of course, known to Moses and it was probably he who
editorially inserted the phrase "and also after that" into Noah's original
record here in Genesis 6:4. Moses probably also inserted the information
that these were the "mighty men of old, men of renown," men whose exploits
of strength and violence had made them famous in song and fable in all
nations in the ages following the Flood. To rebellious men of later times,
they were revered as great heroes, hence the heroes of mythology who have
their basis in historical fact; but in God's sight they were merely
supra-ungodly men of violence and evil.
Before the foundation of the world God had ordained
a particular people of the human race to bear the special oracles and
testimony of Divine revelation. He also chose these people to be the bearers
of the Chieftest of God's manifestation, Jesus Christ, who would come to
redeem a people of His own from the bondage of Satan and his kingdom. It was
the land of Canaan, the crossroads of three continents, into which God had
led his people from Egypt to dwell in and to establish a theocracy through
which the entire world would be blessed. At the time of the arrival of the
Israelites into this specially "promised" land after 40 years of wilderness
wanderings they found it to be already inhabited. It was these indigenous
inhabitants who proved to be great adversaries to the people of God. They,
of course, included the Philistines, after whom the land was later called
Palestine, hence the current rival faction of the Palestinians often heard
about in the news media today in association with the continued conflict in
Israel. The ancient Philistines should be of interest to the student of the
Bible in terms of understanding why God was so "harsh" in dealing with them.
Satan himself was behind the circumstances of the Canaanites and the certain
jeopardy into which they placed the Israelites. Already well known was
Satan's agenda to bring the entire human race to ruin. God's particular
people were targeted above all other peoples because of their unique
mission. All of this makes it the more obvious why a "cleansing" of the land
was necessary when Israel arrived. In spite of God's command to do so, the
Israelites did not "utterly and completely drive the Canaanites from the
land" (Judges 1:28; 3:5-7). The small residue of these people allowed to
continue in the land was sufficient to inflict a considerable degree of
tragedy upon the people of Israel. Nevertheless by the providential
superintendence of God the messianic line was preserved. It is impossible to
imagine what our world would be like today otherwise.
When the Israelites first arrived in the promised
land they thus encountered the Nephilim, that progeny of the second recorded
outbreak of demonic conceptions. In reality the population of the land was
literally infested with these strange beings and their families, and as if
by higher design they were "pre-planted" there, in place, waiting for the
arrival of the Israelites in order that they might be a vexation to them. In
consideration of the promised Seed who was to come out of the Israelites the
ominous presence of the Nephilim makes all the more sense, and all the more
strategic, as well, that the Israelites obey fully the command of God that
the whole race of the Canaanites be totally extirpated. Some of the Biblical
accounts of their destruction at the hands of the Israelite warriors are
most graphic. One specific account illustrating the means whereby the
Israelites were to carry out God's mandate is found in I Samuel 15:3: "Now
go and smite Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them
not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel
and ass." Such descriptions of wholesale slaughter from, of all things, the
Holy Bible, often breach the sensitivities of the reader, if not his very
sensibilities. Even some of our learned expositors literally squirm in the
pulpit as they dare give even a brief treatment for this description of
abject carnage, and it is usually delivered in a timid and almost
apologizing manner, lest there be in the congregation before him a tender
footed believer who might stumble at the hearing of this "harsh posture and
abject atrocity" on behalf of our benevolent and loving God. Often nothing
more is said than "well uh, we may not understand all of these things, but
we can rest assured that God is still a just God in spite of this, and
uh..." Hence the matter is usually left at that with no one really grasping
the deeper significance of the passage. Indeed it is true that God, of a
certainty, is consistent in His righteous integrity, judgment, and loving
kindness. Yet, when the hideous and treacherous nature of the Canaanites is
truly comprehended then the purpose in the movement of God and His people
against these enemies, and the wholesale destruction of the same, takes on a
whole new meaning, significance, and justification. The utterly ungodly
identity, nature, and purpose of these exceedingly depraved murderous
inhabitants becomes chillingly authentic when their origins and heredity is
realized.
When Genesis 6:5 is compared with Matthew 7:11,
Romans 5:7-8, I Timothy 5:25, and I Peter 3:16 a remarkable and most
revealing contrast becomes evident in the essence of evil in man. Whereas
Scripture concurs that there is at least some "good" in every man, even in
the unbeliever, the same discloses that there has been "exceeding" evil in
the nature of certain particular classes of effected individuals at various
epochs in the Biblical record. In the days immediately preceding the Flood
the inhabitants of the Earth are described as being "only evil continually"
(Genesis 6:5). This passage discloses that there was something deeper and
more profound occurring at that time than human sinfulness alone. It was
once said by a famous evangelist that if God does not wipe out San Francisco
he owes an apology to Sodom and Gomorra. There is, although an important
distinction that needs to be brought to light here. It is evident that the
inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah, for instance, were demon possessed and
controlled, and, like those before the Flood, were characterized by
"exceeding" wickedness and violence (Genesis 13:13). Violence is a well
documented characteristic of demon possession (Matthew 8:28-32; Acts
19:13-16). Noteworthy is the rather anomalous preference for "the men" (the
visiting angels at Sodom) rather than the women, or Lot himself, by the
sexually deviant men of the city of Sodom (Genesis 19:1-11). It is apparent
in the context that the men of the city who "desired" the visiting angels
over earthly men, were themselves rather odd to say the least, as if they
were possessed. In other words, the peculiar preference of the men of the
city for these angelic visitors betrayed something important about
themselves, namely that they had some previous cardinal knowledge as
adversaries of God and His Holy angels, and that they were demonically
influenced or possessed. Those sexually devious "sodomites" in our own day
are certainly engaged in an evil and ungodly practice that anticipates the
curse of God, and they are indeed humanly sinful yet they are not
necessarily possessed and controlled by demonic agents. They can still
repent and believe on the Lord. It is those demonic agents which have vexed
man from the beginning, and, were it not for the grace of God they would
have brought mankind to complete ruin already. If it were not for the fact
of demonic adversaries operating behind the scenes in these important
historical episodes God would have a lot of explaining to do in His
seemingly indiscriminate policy toward sinners. What is at stake here is the
categorical and consistent nature of God, and that this is upheld can be
clearly seen in the careful analysis of the targets and administrations of
Divine judgment.
Thus the tenure of God's longsuffering toward
sinful man can be directly correlated with the nature and rabidity of the
perpetrators. In other words Divine judgment is always accelerated and
intensified in the presence of demonic intervention, as the Flood, the fire
and brimstone at Sodom and Gomorrah, and the coming judgment at the end of
the age patently indicate. The leagues of fallen angels, bent on destroying
humanity, are a class of creatures God has emphatically warned man to shun
lest he be taken up with them and perish in the ensuing judgments. It just
goes to show, it pays to avoid bad company. The fall of man in the Garden of
Eden, the account of Noah's Flood, the destructions of the Canaanites with
the arrival of the Israelites in the promised land, and those transactions
during the time of Christ bear this out. These are facts consistent with the
integrity of God and His benign superintendance over His people, as well as
the nature of His revelation. Human depravity brings grief enough to the
Almighty but the exceedingly heinous products of demonic activity He finds
intolerable. This is consistent with the fact that God did not destroy
ancient Nineva or the Roman Empire in such a fashion, and likewise our own
nation today, at least so far. The account in Genesis 6:1-8 is much deeper
and pregnant with significance than the immediate problem of human
ungodliness and sensuality. In and of itself, the human heart is
"desperately wicked" (Jeremiah 11:33), but certainly not (normally) "only
evil continually." The latter is clearly a distinct trademark of a demonic
invasion, which did indeed occur prior to the Flood and which precipitated
the necessity of the destruction of the world that then was, with its mutant
ravaging giants. The evidences from the correlations and inferences of
Scripture bear this out. "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great
in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was
only evil continually" (Genesis 6:5). "But the men of Sodom were wicked and
sinners before the Lord exceedingly" and their sin was "very grievous"
(Genesis 13:13; 18:20).
Just as world conditions in the days before the
Flood pre-staged that early catastrophe, so will world conditions in the
last days of this age foreshadow a potentially greater catastrophe. In that
age there was a tendency to regard God as merely the Creator and Benefactor
rather than as the covenant God of mercy, dealing with transgressors who are
appointed to destruction, and finding a ransom for them. Some of the more
notable characteristics of that age which will also attend the times prior
to the second coming of Christ include the following: preoccupation with
physical appetites (Luke 17:27), rapid advances in technology (Genesis
4:22), grossly materialistic attitudes and interests (Luke 17:28),
uniformitarian philosophies (Hebrews 11:7), inordinate devotion to pleasure
and comfort (Genesis 4:21), no concern for God in either belief or conduct
(II Peter 2:5), an undue prominence of the female sex, and a disregard for
the primacy of the marriage relation (Matthew 24:38), rejection of the
inspired Word of God (I Peter 3:20), population explosion (Genesis 6:1,11),
widespread violence (Genesis 6:11,13), corruption throughout society
(Genesis 6:12), preoccupation with illicit sexual activity (Genesis 4:19;
6:2), widespread words and thoughts of blasphemy (Jude 15), organized
occultic and Satanic activity (Genesis 6:1-4), promulgation of systems and
movements of abnormal depravity (Genesis 6:5,12), and a preponderance of
extraterrestrial or trans-dimensional demonic intervention (Genesis 6:2; I
Timothy 4:1).
In the case of the last effect in the previous
list, it is apparent that this same basic activity of demon possession is
occurring again, today, "as it was in the days of Noe," but in a somewhat
varied form under the guise of "UFO's and aliens from another world" who are
abducting humans and conducting genetic hybridization experiments on them
against their will, in a godless deception perfectly tailored to our modern
technological age. The interest and popularity of the UFO-alien enigma has
become so great in the last few years that television, radio, and the
printed media are rife with features about these occurrences. The whole
affair is very real but, in reality, it is not what it is purported to be
and is not what most people think it is. The anatomy of sin is deception and
much deception is released by Satan and his cohorts into the mainstream of
humanity for consumption. It is compatible with human nature to believe it.
This modified variety of demonic intervention, and possession, is nothing
more than a deceptive attempt by demonic advocates of a fallen angelic order
to supplant the body, soul, and spirit of man as a dwelling place of God and
to pervert and turn man against God, thus doing Satan's "dirty work" for
him, in overturning God's created order on Earth. The solemn fact is that
the essential doctrines of the old pagan philosophers are even now subtly
and widely permeating the western world, in spite of its education and
scientific progress, and are captivating multitudes who would boast of
intellectual superiority to the "poor heathen." For even some who would call
themselves Christian today the Scriptures say "Now the Spirit speaketh
expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving
heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils" (I Timothy 4:1). Now that
much of mankind is laced with drugs, the occult, and the "new age-new world
order" deception, the human race is ripe for the greatest conspiracy and
deception of all time, a great "public disclosure," perfectly fitted to our
time, that "we have made contact" and are being visited by "aliens from
outer space." Many who claim to have had encounters with UFO's have reported
that these objects seem to be more alive and intelligent than just
mechanical craft. Given that our atmosphere is literally swarming with
advocates of "the prince of the power of the air" (Ephesians 2:2; 6:12) it
should come as no surprise that there might be an occasional visible
manifestation of such a presence. The fallen angels have shadowed humanity
ever since Satan deceived our first parents in Eden. Meanwhile God's Holy
angels, in even greater numbers, continue as ministering spirits on behalf
of God's people (Hebrews 1:14), and signal the ultimate victory of good over
evil.
Even though the so called "extraterrestrials" may
appear as "benevolent brothers" the messages derived from and through them
consistently conflict with Biblical Christianity. There is nothing in the
UFO phenomenon that leads to belief in the one true God. The "visitors"
appear to be in tune with what has been known as "New Age" religion,
including eastern mysticism, astral projection, and harmonic convergence,
and so on. None of these are in harmony with Jesus Christ. They are more
interested in steering us away from the one who said, "I am the way, the
truth, and the life," to fool mankind about Bible prophecy, and even to
falsify His coming in the very era of Christ's return. All of this can be
none other than preparation necessary to the events surrounding the rise of
Anti-Christ.
A matter of increasing significance in our ever
closer knit world culture is the attention given by the airwaves (radio and
television) to the UFO activity and the "alien abduction phenomenon," as
reflected by the many programs touching upon these topics. It is already
evident that much of this can be directly associated with the preparatory
new age mentality and the occult, if not outright demonic enterprise. The
potential for confusion over these effects within the Christian community is
not to be underestimated. It is known that most of those involved in the
"new age" movement do not "buy off" on the theory of evolution to any
reckonable degree, as even they appear to see the loop holes in this
decadent philosophy. Yet, neither do adherents of this movement embrace the
Biblical account of creation and Earth history. A third "option" which has
been taking increasing prominence in the cultural arena of our civilization,
if not its overall "religious" characteristic, is the idea that humanity was
"planted" here on Earth by aliens form outer space. More and more the
"proof" of this idea is seen in the UFO and alien abduction phenomenon. The
new age movement is a quiet cancer in society that began in the mid to late
1960's that has now become a well defined world and life view with its own
"theology." Advocates of this movement have well prepared answers for almost
any question one could ask. The vigilant Christian's only safety, counter
measure, and protection against this monstrous deception is his charter, the
Holy Bible. In Scripture the astute Bible student will see the intimate
connection between the past and the present, for every evidence indicates we
are witnessing a major repeat of a bygone epoch. It is quite possible that
we will be seeing much more on these themes along with their "signs and
wonders" in the years that follow, all preparatory to an ultimate judgment.
Since the 1960's, and especially since the Apollo
Moon landing in 1969, the mind set of our culture, particularly among the
youth and even among some "Christian" people, has been ever more preoccupied
with outer space. Popular television programs like Star Trek and Babylon
Five, and the increase in the number of paranormal features, bear this out.
Since the influence of Erich Von Daniken in the 1970's the extraterrestrial
origins of human life has become an ever more popular theme. Unless the
Christian community remains abreast of this rapid development, Christians,
to a large degree, may be, in a manner of speaking, "left in the dust"
insofar as a certain understanding of, and remedy for, what is "up and
coming" today. Noteworthy is the fact that many new age "disciples" express
no surprise at the evidence that humans and dinosaurs once coexisted in our
world. This evidence, of course, should already have come as no surprise to
the Bible believer. With evolution found lacking and defeated, and with the
Bible rejected, many are looking elsewhere, and they find no better place to
look than to the stars for the source of our origins, religious inspiration,
and destiny. It is most evident that a new "Goliath" has arrived, in the
form of a major paradigm shift which is taking place in the minds of the
masses. Even our government may soon be forced to take action with some kind
of a said "disclosure." There is simply too many people being drawn into
this phenomenon, either through direct involvement or indirect influence,
for this to be ignored any longer. Certainly something big and decidedly
evil is coming down on us in these latter days and it is becoming an
inescapable obsession for many, because at the heart of this present day
fascination with UFO's is the prospect of an "alien contact."
UFO-alien abduction encounter groups and
"scientific congresses" are springing up all over the world today to discuss
the experiences of people who have been kidnapped by "little green men" and
placed on operating tables in space ships where these strange beings conduct
surgical procedures on them. Many of these "witnesses" involve world class
personalities. Ten years ago such reports would have been dismissed out of
hand. At one recent conference hosted by a major university one reputable
author expressed astonishment at the quality of stories told by literally
hundreds of men and women. These people had hesitantly and reluctantly come
forth to reveal their truly amazing and utterly convincing accounts of
having been abducted and then examined aboard extraterrestrial spacecraft by
spindly limbed, telepathic gray creatures with oversized foreheads dominated
by huge, compelling, tear-shaped black eyes. A common cry often heard among
abductees about these creatures is "they are not people." Equally astounding
are the similarities found again and again in these accounts and the
consistency of their chilling details. These stories involve people who are
well educated, well dressed, middle and upper class types who themselves
wonder what is happening. The evidence of this activity has become so
widespread that the burden of proof to the contrary now rests squarely on
the skeptics. It is often concluded that if something is "out of sight out
of mind" it is not occurring. As for this UFO - alien abduction phenomenon,
nothing could be further from the truth, and it is not something that is
going to go away. A sequence recently aired on national television showing
alleged U.S. government technicians conducting an autopsy on strange corpses
from a crashed alien space ship has captured a great deal of attention and
generated much controversy. The cement binding this phenomenon to a status
demanding a reckoning is the undeniable fact that, whether one believes it
or not, reports of "close encounters of the fourth kind" are on the
increase. Already, the voices of tormented millions world wide are heard
through the media describing their previously inexplicable experiences. In
the U.S. alone, experts estimate that close to one million people claim to
have been abducted by aliens. These are not cases of individuals vying for
attention or about individuals experiencing some unknown aspect of
themselves, this has every manifestation of a real effect that has its
precedent in, and is decidedly akin to that which resulted from the invasion
of the "sons of God" as the Biblical record reveals in Genesis 6:1-4. There
are many today who are not taking spiritual warfare seriously, if they are
not outright mistaking it for something else. Unless readers recognize the
patent intent of this strategic passage of Scripture the full impact of the
present day crises will ever elude them.
According to a recent survey of several hundred
people, who claimed to have been abducted by aliens, there were no true
Bible believing Christians found among the interviewees. Thus, we find
another "red-flag" indicator that this phenomenon is decidedly demonic. A
single point is clear and that is, the most important issue in our day is
one's own relationship with Jesus Christ and his or her preparedness for the
upcoming spiritual warfare with this "new age theology" with its
accompaniments and effects. Dear reader, are you a born again Christian,
according to the Scripture? One of Christ's great comforts to the believer
is the Biblical declaration that "...greater is he that is in you, than he
that is in the world." -I John 4:4 All of the aforementioned conditions
prevailed in the days of Noah and they are all now increasingly evident
today. There is good reason, therefore, to believe that these present times,
however long they may endure, are those which immediately precede the return
of the Lord Jesus Christ. The Scriptures clearly tell us that the judgment
in Noah's time presaged the personal advent of Christ in judgment at the end
time. The Satanic triad (the Dragon, Beast or Anti-Christ, and the False
Prophet), in all its malignity is already at work to carry out the fullness
of the mystery of iniquity. This is the ultimate antithesis and corruption
of the Holy Triune God of creation Himself, the Father, Son (Christ), and
Holy Spirit. Only God, and Him alone, through Jesus Christ can save us from
the judgment to come. "For true and righteous are his judgments..." -
Revelation 19:2a.
Now if we receive the word of God "with all
readiness of mind," and "search the scriptures daily" to see "whether those
things were so" (Acts 17:11), not "adding unto the word," nor "taking away
from it" (Deuteronomy 4:2; Revelation 22:18-19), "comparing spiritual things
with spiritual" (I Corinthians 2:13), "knowing this first, that no prophecy
of the Scripture is of any private interpretation," (II Peter 1:20), and
knowing we follow not "cunningly devised fables" (II Peter 1:16), and most
of all, realizing that there is a blessing for them that readeth, heareth,
and keepeth the word of God (John 20:31; Revelation 1:3), then we shall
find, as Enoch's knowledge of God's appearing some five thousand years ago
showed him, that the secrets of God are ever with them that fear Him.
| "But
without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God
must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that
diligently seek him." (Hebrews 11:6) |
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Douglas, J. D., The New Bible Dictionary, William B. Eerdmans
Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1962.
Gaverluk, Emil, and Jack Hamm, Did Genesis Man Conquer Space?, Thomas
Nelson Inc., Nashville, Tennessee, 1974.
Missler, Church, and Eastman, Mark, Alien
Encounters, 1997, Koinonia House, PO Box D, Coeur d'Alene, ID. 83816.
Morris, Henry M., The Genesis Record, Baker Book House, Grand Rapids,
Michigan, 1976.
Pember, George Hawkins, Earth's Earliest Ages, Hodder and Stoughton,
London, 1876.
Rhodes, Ron, The Culting of America, Harvest House Publishers,
Eugene, Oregon, 1994.
Scheeben, Matthias Joseph, The Mysteries of Christianity, B. Herder
Book Company, St. Louis Missouri, 1946.
Steeg, Richard A., Spacemen or Angels, The Agape Arts, Hayward,
California, 1974.
Stedman, Ray C.
Exposition of Genesis
Chapter 6, "Signs of Collapse" (Bible study on the
giants of old)
June 10, 1996
NEPHALIM AT LARGE
Diabolical activities include: conspiracy, human-napping, illicit medical
practice, extortion, aiding and abetting covert government collaboration,
impersonation and misrepresentation, and many other evil and deceptive acts
against the people of God's created order.
Copyright © 1995 by J. Timothy Unruh Box 1034 Rocklin, California 95677-1034
Item No. 22121995JTU
Further information on this topic may be found in the author's book
Phaeton the Lost Planet.
Additional Related Information:
DID BIBLICAL GIANTS BUILD THE CIRCLE OF THE REFAIM?
by Barry Chamish (chamish@netmedia.net.il)
One of the last great barely known wonders of the
ancient world is a Stonehenge-like monument sitting atop Israel's Golan
Heights. Called Gilgal Refaim (The Circle Of The Refaim) in Hebrew, the
monument consists of five concentric stone rings whose diameter is 155
meters.
The best preserved of the rings is the outermost,
whose height reaches 2 meters and thickness 3.3 meters. Some of the stones
used to create the ring weigh twenty tons. The total weight of the stones is
37,000 tons.
In the middle of the rings is a cairn, topped by a
tumulus, measuring twenty meters across.
Despite the obvious attraction to archaeologists,
the rings remained hidden while the suspicious Syrian regimes held the Golan
Heights and were only opened to inspection after Israel won the area in the
Six Day War of 1967.
One feature of the rings has particularly
fascinated the few people who have studied them. It is the meaning of two
large openings, somewhat like doorways, one facing northeast, the other
southeast.
In 1968 Professor Yonathan Mizrahi of the
Department of Anthropology at Harvard University and Prof. Anthony Aveni of
Colgate University discovered that in 3000 BCE, the first rays of the summer
solstice would have appeared directly through the northeast opening as seen
from the central tumulus. At the same time, the southeast opening provided a
direct view of Sirius.
One function of the circles then, was an
astronomical observatory and stellar calendar. Or was it?
Prof. Mizrahi is doubtful. "Why would they have
undertaken such a massive building project, collecting 37,000 tons of stone
and painstakingly laying them down to last forever, when the same task could
have been completed using one rock and a stick?"
In fact, no one knows why the site was built --
thus speculation is rife. Micah Ankouri, for instance, writing in Teva
Ve'aretz (Land and Nature) spends five pages trying to provide a connection
between the circles and Far Eastern mandalas. He concludes that Gilgal
Refaim was an "astronomical observatory providing social harmony through its
communal construction and proof of the perfection of the universe."
The astronomical dating confirms lichenometric
tests and carbon dating of potsherds found on the site. In fact, the
professors erred on the side of conservatism. The sherds dated to the Early
Bronze Age, 3rd millenium BCE, 5000 years ago. A three layered burial
monument was added to the central cairn a thousand years later. Thus, the
circles pre-date the pyramids and Babylonian temples, making them the oldest
astronomical complex in the Middle East.
The mysteries continue. Gilgal Refaim is the only
megalithic astronomical complex on earth built of loose stones. It resembles
more ruins found on Malta and in Zimbabwe than European sites built at the
same time and possibly for the same purpose.
But despite the similarity of purpose, supposedly
the simple nomads of the region had no contact with Europe. Nor were the
shepherd tribes prone to massive building projects. Gilgal Refaim was the
only such undertaking in the Middle East at the time. There was no apparent
cultural reason for this unique engineering project.
For those seeking a possible UFO connection: the
circles were built on a flat plateau. No one could have seen the shape of
the monument from ground level and there were no hills nearby to gaze upon
it. Yet the monument could only have been appreciated from above. It was as
likely a message to the stars as a stellar observatory.
In the general region of the rings are hundreds of
dolmens, similar in appearance to those found in northern Britain and
France. Moshe Hartal, Chief Archaeologist of the Golan explains, "We have
identified 8,500 dolmens of twenty separate styles on the Golan Heights.
Each tribe had its own dolmen style. The biggest dolmen stones weigh over 50
tons and are seven metres in height. Graves are found within some domens but
not all. Their function was not purely funereal."
If the dolmens surrounding Gilgal Refaim were an
integral part of the site, then it was an enormous project encompassing more
area than at the Giza pyramids. Hartel is reluctant to draw such a
conclusion, taking the more conservative view that the dolmens were built
over time around the attraction of the circles.
One fact stands out. The local nomadic tribes of
the time did not build any other remotely similar monument. Circle building
was not a fashion of the era among the herdsmen and that, combined with
their unsuitable, primitive technology, seems to rule out their construction
of the circles.
If the local inhabitants didn't build the rings,
then who did? Surpisingly, there is strong evidence that the biblical giants
or Refaim were the architects and engineers who constructed the monument.
Consider the following biblical clues, written in
modern terminology (The Book, Tyndale House Publishers):
-- In Genesis 14:5, we are told the Refaim inhabit
the place called Ashtherot-Karnaim. Just ten miles from the rings is the
site of an ancient Canaanite city called Ashtherot. It is named after the
Canaanite goddess of war and, contradictorily, love. Ashterot was the
Canaanite name for Sirius, from which the Hebrew name Esther was derived.
-- In Joshua 12:4, we learn that "King Og of Bashan,
the last of the Refaim, who lived at Ashtarot... ruled a territory
stretching From Mount Hermon in the north...
-- In 1 Chronicles 6:71, we are told that the
half-tribe of Manasseh later inhabited "Golan," in Bashan.
-- The most explicit description of the size of the
people of Bashan is found in Deuteronomy 3. King Og is attacked and
defeated. "King Og of Bashan was the last of the great Refaim. His iron
bedstead is kept at Rabbah... and measures thirteen and a half feet long and
six feet wide." In the same chapter we are informed that "The Sidonians
called Mount Hermon, 'Sirion.'"
-- In Deuteronomy, we are told that the Refaim
"were a large and powerful tribe, as tall as the Anakim (giants)."
-- In Chronicles 20, the last of the Anakim is
killed. "A giant with six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot,
whose father was also a giant,... was killed by David's nephew Jonathan.
These giants were descendants of the giants of Gath and were killed by David
and his soldiers."
The respected Jerusalem biblical author, Rabbi
Yisrael Herczeg, hardly an advocate of ancient alien theories, nonethless
confirms the possibility that giant heavenly beings or their descendants
could have constructed the circles.
"The Jewish oral tradition says Og, the King of
Bashan, stowed away on Noah's ark and was the only survivor of the flood
outside Noah's family. Og was descended from the Nefilim, deities who fell
from the heavens."
Aliens?
"No, more like fallen angels. Og had children with
Noah's daughters and they were hybrid giants called the Anakim or Refaim.
They existed in ancient times and the Bible records their presence in the
Golan Heights. They could have built Gilgal Refaim."
12/97 (news article) |